J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci Search


J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci > Volume 22(4); 2022 > Article
Kamal, Ain, Ullah, Mohammed, Hussin, Omar, Najmi, Ahmad, Ab Rahman, Mahmud, Othman, and Mohamed: A Low-Profile Quasi-Loop Magneto-Electric Dipole Antenna Featuring a Wide Bandwidth and Circular Polarization for 5G mmWave Device-to-Device Communication


The deployment of the millimeter (mmWave) frequency spectrum by fifth-generation (5G) device-to-device (D2D) wireless networks is anticipated to meet the growing demands for increased capacity. The antenna is regarded of as an important determinant that guarantees the maximum performance of wireless communication. This paper presents a low-profile magneto-electric (ME) dipole antenna for 5G mmWave D2D communication. A single-element quasi-loop radiator was designed to excite horizontal polarization, and a coaxial probe was used to produce vertical polarization. Subsequently, the structure of the radiator was transformed into a two-element quasi-loop antenna to achieve an omnidirectional radiation pattern with relatively enhanced gain. A coaxially fed T-junction microstrip element was implemented to equally distribute the signal between the two quasi-loop radiators and attain proper impedance matching. Furthermore, a pair of shorting pins was introduced into the two-element design to maintain the circularly polarized (CP) radiation. The finest values of the axial ratio and |S11| were derived by rigorously optimizing all the geometry parameters. Both single-element and two-element quasi-loop antennas were fabricated and characterized experimentally on the air substrate. The advantage of avoiding a physical substrate is to realize a wide bandwidth, circumvent dielectric losses, and ascertain the maximum gain. The measured and simulated results agree thoroughly with each other. Stable in-band CP radiation were accomplished, thus confirming an appropriate field vector combination from the coaxial probe and the radiator. The finalized antenna engaged an area of ~7.6λ02 for operation at 23.9–30.0 GHz with an axial ratio <3 dB, radiation efficiency ~80%, and gain >5 dBic.

I. Introduction

The demand for superior capacity systems has significantly escalated with the rapid increase in portable data traffic and smartphone consumers [1]. In the approaching era of future technology, present-day and envisaged services—for instance, three-dimensional holography, short-range connectivity, telepresence, hypermedia sharing, and the like—will require data rates that are unattainable with fourth-generation (4G) technology [2, 3]. Fifth-generation (5G) wireless gadgets are anticipated to seamlessly support these facilities by adopting the mmWave frequency spectrum [4, 5].
Device-to-device (D2D) communication is presently regarded as an essential technology of the 5G in view of the fact that it facilitates consumers’ communication with each other exclusive of the conventional base station [68]. Moreover, D2D communication requires low transmit power, which eventually enables a full duplex operation. Correspondingly, D2D communication offers better total throughput, spectrum reuse capability, and a greater density of users to connect with low latency. Meanwhile, a few challenges, including security, mode selection, device discovery, interference administration, resource management, and power control, are faced by D2D communication technology. Typical D2D communication scenarios in a 5G network are illustrated in Fig. 1.
The antenna is respected as a vital module that ensures the high-quality operation of D2D communication [9, 10]. In the preceding few decades, printed radiating elements have obtained substantial consideration among several categories of antennas on account of their ability to receive or broadcast electromagnetic waves with, among others, an easy manufacturing procedure [1113]. Several introductory surveys on the fundamental requirements of long-distance 5G mmWave communication substantiate that antenna arrays offering a high gain and directional beam are required [14, 15]. Alternatively, antennas offering a low gain are appropriate for D2D communication [16, 17]. However, some efforts are required to assure the benefits of D2D communication: (1) improving the bandwidth for a high data rate and large system capacity as D2D communication can employ licensed as well as unlicensed frequency spectrums; (2) realizing omnidirectional circularly polarized (CP) radiation for D2D communication because, in complex wireless channels, they can circumvent any polarization mismatch complications, produce considerable radiation coverage, and facilitate diverse communication links between multiple users; and (3) reducing the size and simplifying the fabrication procedure for compact D2D communication devices.
Research demonstrates that wideband antennas can be realized with complementary structures [18], magneto-electric (ME) dipoles [19], slotted radiators [20], lumped LC resonators [21], parasitic elements [22], and a reactive impedance surface [23]. However, most of these methods exhibit spurious coupling, low gain, design complexity, or a large footprint. Certain vital parameters of antenna systems, such as gain, can be enhanced by integrating several connected radiating elements. However, the constraint related to engaging a larger area is associated with antenna arrays.
Moreover, omnidirectional antennas can equally broadcast and receive electromagnetic waves in all directions [24]. Furthermore, they provide greater reliability, particularly in situations where cellular sites are congested—for instance, at stadiums and malls. However, very few omnidirectional antennas have been published in the mmWave bands, owing to the difficulties that a developer will experience as being relative to creating directional antennas. For example, the antenna's ground must be appropriately situated; otherwise, the generated electromagnetic radiation may be reflected, degrading the desired omnidirectional pattern. In fact, printed dipoles are a good illustration of this, as the presence of a ground plane enables the dipoles to automatically generate directional radiation. Consequently, this antenna is extensively employed as a driving element in Yagi-Uda antennas and arrays that produce more focused beams. Since additional feed networks typically incorporate grounds, omnidirectional antenna arrays are significantly more complicated to build. Hence, most planned omnidirectional antennas have a complicated system, a large footprint, and poor gain.
In the receiving antenna, however, omnidirectionality causes phase inaccuracy and multipath wave reflections. As a result, CP antennas are commonly used to broadcast signals on both vertical and horizontal planes, while achieving a complete revolution in a single wavelength. Additionally, CP antennas have achieved significant consideration in several wireless communication systems, owing to their attractive characteristics such as multipath interference suppression, stable communication links, and immunity toward polarization mismatch [25]. As a result, omnidirectional gain patterns on CP antennas are beneficial for short-range communication [2629]. CP antennas can be categorized into four distinct types corresponding to their working principles: complementary dipole [30], traveling wave [31], lens [32], and turnstile structures (for instance, the helical [33], spiral [34], hybrid helical-spiral [35], or loop [36]). However, the majority of these practices illustrate complicated configurations or high profiles. Furthermore, due to the substantially lower wavelengths at mmWave frequencies, the majority of these techniques are not viable for 5G networks.
This paper initially presents a novel design of a single-element quasi-loop ME dipole radiator to generate CP radiation. Later, the single-element structure of the radiator was extended to a two-element quasi-loop antenna comprising a pair of shorting pins and a T-junction microstrip element to realize an omnidirectional radiation pattern and relatively higher gain (>5 dBic) values. Wide bandwidth (6.1 GHz), stable CP radiation (axial ratio <3 dB), and the desired resonant frequency characteristics were derived by rigorously optimizing all geometry parameters. The finalized antenna occupied an overall area of ~7.6λ02 only. The computational models of antennas were implemented in CST Microwave Studio Suite.
The novelty and importance of the proposed work are stated as follows. (1) The radiating element has a novel design that contributes to improving the overall performance of the antenna. (2) The proposed antenna offers better performance in terms of its simple design, low cost, compact size, and wide bandwidth compared with the ME dipole antennas described in recent publications. (3) Typically, there is no standard method for determining the number and position of the shorting pins to achieve enhanced performance from the antenna. Hence, the rigorous analysis carried out in this study would be beneficial for the electromagnetic community in understanding the behavior of an antenna loaded with shorting pins. (4) Manufacturing miniature sheet metal microstrip antennas with the air substrate for 5G applications encounters severe challenges, especially during the cutting of the metal sheet, because their wavelengths are much smaller at mmWave frequencies. Hence, the quasi-loop antenna was designed in such a manner that it could be cut easily using a traditional computer numerical control (CNC) machining technique. (5) The ability of a dielectric substrate to keep the conducting plates from coming into contact with each other is critical. Since the proposed antenna is compact and incorporates shorting pins, it can support copper sheets and be easily integrated with the rest of the mmWave 5G front end. (6) The proposed antenna was characterized experimentally in an anechoic chamber by realizing it as a prototype that demonstrated an accurate simulation and measurement result agreement, thereby validating their novelty.
The remainder of this paper is organized in the following manner: Section II describes the design methodology and geometrical configuration of an ME dipole antenna. Sections III and IV communicate their operating principle and parametric investigation, respectively. Section V presents the experimental validation of the proposed antenna. Section VI compares the proposed quasi-loop antenna with contemporary designs. Finally, Section VII offers the conclusion we arrive to after conducting this research.

II. Antenna Design and Configuration

The design perception was instigated from the theory revealed in [24], which states that a cardioid-shaped radiation pattern can be produced in the φ = 0° direction with orthogonally positioned electric and magnetic dipoles and in-phase excitation. Correspondingly, cardioid-shaped radiation patterns in both φ = 0° and φ = 180° directions can be generated by employing electric and magnetic dipoles located in parallel and 90° out-of-phase excitation [37]. As a result, the omnidirectional CP design goal is to create an electric dipole (vertical electric current) and a magnetic dipole (adjacent in-phase loop current) in a compact structure.
Microstrip antennas can be designed in a variety of shapes, including rectangles, squares, circular rings, triangles, disc sectors, circles, ring sectors, and so on. Circular-shaped microstrip antennas have several advantages, including their design flexibility, maximum bandwidth in GHz, acceptable lossy properties, increased gain, and desired electric and magnetic field strength patterns [38]. According to [39], adding slots to a circular microstrip can improve the desired properties of an antenna. Similarly, to improve the performance of circular patches, researchers have developed antennas in a taper shape [40] as well as the slot technique [41]. Additionally, rings and patches were made with several of these shapes [42]. Therefore, in the present study, it was decided to build a circular-shaped microstrip antenna with a radius (r) estimated using the resonant frequency (f) expression mentioned below [43, 44]:
where c stands for the light speed in free space, knm represents the mth zero of the derivatives of the n-order Bessel function, ɛr signifies the relative dielectric constant, and h indicates the height of the substrate.
In 1981, a high-quality microwave resonator known as a split-ring resonator, which comprised a conducting tube with a tiny slit along its length, was described for the first time. This resonator’s features included uniform field distributions, design flexibility, high isolation between electric and magnetic fields, and simple and inexpensive fabrication [45]. Hence, its design was soon adapted for electron spin resonance investigations and was termed a loop-gap resonator [46]. Since then, several researchers have continued to develop these resonators for wireless applications and the term "loop-gap resonator" has largely prevailed [4750]. Loop-gap resonators are very efficient because of the existence of the microwave magnetic field suitably within the loop, which, thus, can be employed to numerous coupling mechanisms— for instance, microstrip lines and loop antennas [51]. Consequently, in the current experiment, a loop gap was introduced into the circular-shaped microstrip antenna design.
In [52], a low-profile center-fed circular-shaped microstrip patch loaded with two annular rings was reported. This antenna was efficient in realizing a wide bandwidth monopole-like radiation pattern and a gain of ~6 dBi. Hence, in the present investigation, two annular rings were employed with the outer ring comprising a loop gap. Furthermore, copper (Cu) was chosen as the radiating material because of its strong electrical conductivity, and air (ɛr = 1) was selected as the substrate to accomplish a wide bandwidth, circumvent dielectric losses, and ascertain the maximum gain value. Additionally, to minimize manufacturing difficulties and maintain the mechanical stability of the air-substrate antenna, both annular rings were connected, as illustrated in Fig. 2 (Case 1). A bandwidth that covers a frequency of 24 GHz was realized by the geometry of Case 1; however, the axial ratio values were poor, as shown in Fig. 2(a).
In [53], CP radiation with an axial-ratio bandwidth of 72 MHz were generated using a circular polarizer with two semicircular split rings. Subsequently, in the current design, three more distinct cases were investigated for the design of the radiator with wideband CP characteristics, as shown in Fig. 2 (Cases 2–4). All instances achieved a bandwidth that covered the 24 GHz frequency, although Case 3's axial ratio values were found to be unsatisfactory, as demonstrated in Fig. 2(a). Considering the left- or right-hand (L/RH) CP gain curves illustrated in Fig. 2(b) and the variance in the E-field magnitude shown in Fig. 2(c), it can be concluded that the radiator's strength becomes important with more quasi-loops in the radiator and vice versa. Moreover, in the θ = +90° and −90° directions, the phase variations of 169°, 180°, and 4° were noticed for Cases 1–3, respectively, as illustrated in Fig. 2(d). These differences were higher than those attained with the Case 4 representation, 2°. Hence, the quasi-loop radiator displayed as Case 4 was chosen as the finest layout among the four evolution cases and considered for additional analyses.
Even though a bandwidth of 6.10 GHz with an axial ratio <3 dB was accomplished by the Case 4 outline, the unidirectional radiation pattern and the low gain of 3.83 dBic were counted as vital problems to be worked out. Therefore, a two-element quasi-loop antenna was designed. A pair of shorting pins was introduced in the two-element ME dipole to maintain CP radiation. Furthermore, a T-junction microstrip element was considered to distribute the signal equally between the two quasi-loop radiators and attain proper impedance matching. The width (w) and length (l) of the feed network were approximated using these equations [54]:
Furthermore, the impedances of the three microstrip lines attached to a single junction were verified from the subsequent calculation [55]:
where Z0 symbolizes the input line characteristic impedance, Z1 and Z2 correspond to the output line characteristic impedances, and B denotes the reactance produced at the T-junction.
The geometrical configurations of both single-element and two-element quasi-loop antennas are depicted in Fig. 3. Their parameter values are listed in Table 1. The thickness of Cu (quasi-loop radiator and ground) and air (substrate) was selected as 1 mm.

III. Operating Principle

Fundamentally, CP radiation represent two orthogonal components (Eφ and Eθ) with a phase difference of 90° [56]. In the proposed design, the horizontal currents on the quasi-loop radiator and the ground plane generated the magnetic dipole for primary involvements to the Eφ in the far field, whereas the vertical currents on the coaxial probe and the shorting pins produced the electric dipole for fundamental participations to the Eθin the far field. Subsequently, the magnetic and electric dipoles were positioned parallel to one another.
Fig. 4 shows the simulated time-varying surface current distribution of the single-element quasi-loop antenna at 24 GHz. It is clearly noticeable from these plots that the current was principally formed in the −y direction at 0°. However, the current direction changed to the −x direction at 90°. Moreover, the current dominated in the +y direction at 180°, whereas the current direction deviated to the +x direction at 270°. Hence, it was concluded that the traveling wave CP quasi-loop current was formed at the radiator.

IV. Parametric Investigation

To develop an optimum design, the quasi-loop antenna radii, widths, length, air substrate thickness, and the height of Cu were analyzed, as shown in Fig. 5(a)–5(e), Fig. 5(f)–5(i), Fig. 5(j), Fig. 5(k), and Fig. 5(l), respectively. These parameters predominantly ascertained the resonant frequency and CP performance of the radiation. Three distinct values (mm) for all parameters were investigated: r1 = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5; r2 = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0; r3 = 2.5, 3.0, 3.5; r4 = 3.5, 4.0, 4.5; r5 = 5.0, 5.5, 6.0; w1 = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0; w2 = 1.5, 2.0, 2.5; w3 = 0, 0.2, 0.5; w4 = 1.5, 2.0, 2.5; l1 = 0.0, 5.0, 2.5; and air = Cu = 0.5, 1, 1.5. Note that the finest results are outlined in red-colored curves for easy identification. Appropriate impedance matching in the anticipated 5G mmWave spectrum with wideband characteristics was accomplished for the majority of cases, excluding w4 = 1.5, l1 = 0.0, and 2.5 and air = Cu = 0.5. However, the axial ratio values were beyond the 3 dB range for r1 = 0.5, r2 = 3.0, r3 = 3.5, r4 = 3.5, r5 = 6.0, w1 = 0.1, w2 = 1.5 and 2.5, w3 = 0 and 0.5, w4 = 1.5 and 2.5, l1 = 0.0 and 2.5, air = 0.5 and 1.5, and Cu = 0.5. A few cases demonstrated a wider bandwidth compared to the finalized parameter values, but their radiation characteristics were relatively poor. A similar investigation was conducted with and without (w/o) shorting pins in the two-element quasi-loop antenna. Their results are illustrated in Fig. 6(m), which confirms the importance of shorting pins in yielding CP radiation.
In summary, the quasi-loop parameters affect the axial ratio bandwidth only. However, the dimensions of the T-junction element are crucial since even minor variations cause the antenna to perform poorly in terms of the resonant frequency and axial ratio bandwidth. Furthermore, the substrate height and the metal thickness are related to the impedance bandwidth, whereas the shorting pins are responsible for achieving an appropriate axial ratio bandwidth.

V. Experimental Validation

To validate the simulation results, a two-element quasi-loop arrangement on the air substrate was fabricated by Hitronik Pvt. Ltd. and characterized experimentally in an anechoic chamber. The HPC4312-12 connector constructed by A-Info Inc. was used for quasi-loop antenna feeding. The Microwave Network Analyzer (N5245A PNA-X) manufactured by Agilent (Keysight) Technologies, was utilized to compute the impedance bandwidth. Horn antenna part no. JXTXLB-180400 (18–40 GHz frequency range; 10 dBi gain; linear polarization; 10 W power handling; 2.0:1 VSWR) produced by ChengDu Ainfo Inc. was employed as the source assembly, whereas the fabricated quasi-loop antenna was respected as the reception structure. The horn antenna and the quasi-loop ME dipole were connected to an immovable stand and rotary mechanism, respectively. With an appropriate alignment, both antennas were placed at a distance from the far field. Consequently, on the signal generator, the transmitter’s signal power level was established. The data from the horn antenna was recorded and employed to clarify the CP radiation of the quasi-loop antenna. Following this step, the power losses (received and cable) were examined to acquire the definite power received. Finally, the definite- and maximum-received powers were stabilized. An outstanding agreement between the measured and simulation results was witnessed.
The antenna measurement set-up is shown in Fig. 6(a). The measured and simulated axial ratio and impedance bandwidth of the two-element quasi-loop configuration are described in Fig. 6(b). The two-element quasi-loop antenna functioned at 23.9–30.0 GHz. Additionally, a wide axial ratio bandwidth was noticed on the broadside (φ = θ = 0°) direction. The measured and simulated L/RH CP gain of the two-element quasi-loop layout at 28 GHz in the φ = 0° and 90° planes is illustrated in Fig. 7. A stable response in the omnidirectional CP operating band was established.
Fig. 8 proves that the measured and simulated efficiencies (radiation and total) >75% and the gain and directivity ≳5 dBic were realized by the two-element quasi-loop design. A relatively high gain was achieved when the two-element quasi-loop ME dipole antenna was employed.

VI. Comparison and Discussion

Table 2 presents a comparison of the performance of the proposed configuration with that of the contemporary designs. Compact antennas were realized by employing complementary structures [18], slotted radiators [20], parasitic elements [22], a reactive impedance surface [23], a complementary dipole [30], a lens [32], spirals [34], and a loop [36], respectively. However, the relatively smaller bandwidth—i.e., ≲3 GHz—was achieved by all these arrangements. The ME dipole described in [19] accomplished a bandwidth >14 GHz, but it occupied a large area of ~12λ02 along with a complex design. Likewise, the lumped LC resonators [21] and the traveling-wave [31], helical [33], and hybrid helical-spiral [35] structures left a considerable footprint. In contrast with the recent ME dipole antennas presented in [5760], the proposed antenna outperforms in terms of its simple design, low cost, compact size, and large bandwidth.

VII. Conclusion

In this paper, a low-profile quasi-loop ME dipole antenna was reported to realize a wide bandwidth and stable mmWave CP radiation. The vertical currents on the coaxial probe and the shorting pins generated the electric dipole, whereas the horizontal currents on the quasi-loop radiator and the ground plane produced the magnetic dipole. The quasi-loop parameters have an impact on the axial ratio's bandwidth. Even slight variations in the T-junction element's size have an adverse effect on the axial ratio bandwidth and resonant frequency of the antenna. The shorting pins impacted the impedance bandwidth while the substrate height and metal thickness controlled the axial ratio bandwidth. The quasi-loop antenna was designed in a manner that made it simple to cut with a typical CNC machining technique. The proposed antenna features shorting pins that can hold copper sheets, making it straightforward to interface with the rest of the mmWave 5G front end. Future research should focus on low-cost air susbtrate antenna designs with small footprints, high gain, and beam steering capabilities.


This work was supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia, under Research University (Grant No. RUI.1001.PELECT.8014127).

Fig. 1
Typical D2D communication scenarios in a 5G network: consumers can communicate with one another via direct D2D links and can function as relays for mobile networks.
Fig. 2
Simulated results for the antenna evolution Cases 1–4: (a) |S11| and axial ratio, (b) azimuth plane radiation patterns at 24 GHz, (c) E-field magnitudes, and (d) E-field phases.
Fig. 3
Geometrical configuration of (a) single-element and (b) two-element quasi-loop ME dipole antennas.
Fig. 4
Simulated surface current distribution of the single-element quasi-loop ME dipole antenna at 24 GHz.
Fig. 5
Parametric simulation study of |S11| and the axial ratio for the design of optimum quasi-loop ME dipole antennas. Radii of (a) r1, (b) r2, (c) r3, (d) r4, (e) r5. Widths of (f) w1, (g) w2, (h) w3, (i) w4. Length of (j) l1. (k) Air substrate thickness. (l) Height of Cu. (m) Shorting pins.
Fig. 6
(a) Antenna measurement set-up, (b) simulated and measured |S11| and axial ratio of the two-element quasi-loop ME dipole antenna.
Fig. 7
Simulated and measured L/RH CP gain of the two-element quasi-loop ME dipole antenna in the (a) φ = 0° and (b) φ = 90° at 28 GHz.
Fig. 8
Simulated and measured results of the two-element quasi-loop ME dipole antenna: (a) efficiencies (radiation and total) and (b) gain and directivity.
Table 1
Parameter values of the quasi-loop magneto-electric dipole antennas (unit: mm)
Parameter Value
r1 1.0
r2 2.5
r3 3.0
r4 4.0
r5 5.5
w1 0.5
w2 2.0
w3 0.2
w4 2.0
l1 5.0
Table 2
Performance summary
Study Antenna type BW (GHz) Gain (dBi) RE (%) Simple design M (ɛr) Height, h (mm) Electrical size (λ0)
Li et al. [18] Complementary split-ring resonator 3.10 NR NR Yes 2.2 0.51 0.47 × 0.54
Wu et al. [19] ME dipole 14.5 12.8 85 No 2.2 1.50 3.78 × 2.94
Kamal et al. [20] Negative meander line 2.16 8.40 83 Yes 3.3 0.81 2.52 × 0.84
Kamal et al. [21] Lumped-element resonator 3.30 10.6 91 Yes 1.0 3.00 5.00 × 2.00
Su et al. [22] Parasitic elements 1.40 10.8 90 No 4.4 6.52 0.95 × 0.95
Kamal and Chaudhari [23] Reactive impedance surface 3.33 4.23 75 No 4.4 2.00 0.13 × 0.13
Zhang et al. [30] Complementary dipole 0.95 8.00 81 No 1.0 50.0 1.52 × 0.80
Rao et al. [31] Traveling-wave structure 0.20 10.7 95 No 4.4 29.9 2.06 × 3.60
Lima et al. [32] Lens 2.00 27.3 64 Yes 2.2 0.25 1.10 × 1.10
Zhang et al. [33] Helical 0.35 6.50 NR No 4.4 128 rad = 6.03
Nakano et al. [34] Spiral 0.80 6.70 NR No 3.7 12.0 0.36 × 0.36
Nakano et al. [35] Hybrid helical-spiral 1.05 9.00 100 No 1.0 6.8 rad = 6π
Hirose et al. [36] Loop 0.11 10.0 NR No 1.0 λ0/16 1.98λ0
Feng et al. [57] ME dipole 2.76 NR 80 No 2.2 0.62λ0 1.27 × 1.27
Sun and Luk [58] ME dipole 2.86 8.5 NR No 2.2 2.69λ0 1.49 × 1.49
Song et al. [59] ME dipole 2.85 6.0 80 No 4.4 0.167λ0 0.66 × 0.66
El-Halwagy et al. [60] ME dipole 2.38 12.6 95 No 1.5 0.67λ0 3.84 × 0.94
Proposed ME dipole 6.10 5.28 78.25 Yes 1.0 3.00 ~7.6λ02

BW = bandwidth, RE = radiation efficiency, M = material, NR = not reported.


1. M. Masoudi, M. G. Khafagy, A. Conte, A. El-Amine, B. Françoise, C. Nadjahi et al., "Green mobile netorks for 5G and beyond," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 107270–107299, 2019.
2. E. K. Carlson, "What will 5G bring? Engineering, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 725–727, 2020.
3. A. Kristoffersson, S. Coradeschi and A. Loutfi, "A review of mobile robotic telepresence," Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2013, article no. 3, 2013; https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316 .
crossref pdf
4. S. Kamal, A. S. Mohammed, M. F. Bin Ain, F. Najmi, R. Hussin, Z. A. Ahmad, U. Ullah, M. Othman and M. F. Ab Rahman, "An assessment of progress in 5.8 GHz quasi-lumped element resonator antennas," IETE Technical Review, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 328–346, 2021.
5. I. A. Zubir, M. Othman, U. Ullah, S. Kamal, M. F. Ab Rahman, R. Hussin et al., "A low-profile hybrid multi-permittivity dielectric resonator antenna with perforated structure for Ku and K band applications," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 151219–151228, 2020.
6. F. Jameel, Z. Hamid, F. Jabeen, S. Zeadally and M. A. Javed, "A survey of device-to-device communications: research issues and challenges," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2133–2168, 2018.
7. M. N. Tehrani, M. Uysal and H. Yanikomeroglu, "Device-to-device communication in 5G cellular networks: challenges, solutions, and future directions," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 86–92, 2014.
8. J. Qiao, X. S. Shen, J. W. Mark, Q. Shen, Y. He and L. Lei, "Nabling device-to-device communications in millimeter-wave 5G cellular networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 209–215, 2015.

9. C. X. Mao, S. Gao and Y. Wang, "Dual-band full-duplex Tx/Rx antennas for vehicular communications," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 4059–4070, 2018.
10. A. Li and K. M. Luk, "Single-layer wideband end-fire dual-polarized antenna array for device-to-device communication in 5G wireless systems," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5142–5150, 2020.
11. U. Ullah, N. Mahyuddin, Z. Arifin, M. Z. Abdullah and A. Marzuki, "Antenna in LTCC technologies: a review and the current state of the art," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 241–260, 2015.
12. S. Kamal, A. S. Mohammed, M. F. Ain, F. Najmi, R. Hussin, Z. A. Ahmad and et al, "28 GHz mmWave quasi-lumped element resonator antenna on air-substrate," In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Applied Electromagnetics (APACE); Melacca, Malaysia. 2019; pp 1–4.
13. S. Kamal, A. S. Mohammed, M. F. Ain, U. Ullah, F. Najmi, R. Hussin and et al, "A 28 GHz mmWave circular microstrip antenna with rectangular slots on air-substrate," In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference (RFM); 2020; pp 1–4.
14. W. Hong, K. H. Baek, Y. Lee, Y. Kim and S. T. Ko, "Study and prototyping of practically large-scale mmWave antenna systems for 5G cellular devices," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 63–69, 2014.
15. W. Roh, J. Y. Seol, J. Park, B. Lee, J. Lee, Y. Kim, J. Cho, K. Cheun and F. Aryanfar, "Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2014.
16. T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, M. K. Samimi and S. Sun, "Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, 2015.
17. S. Kamal, M. F. B. Ain, U. Ullah, A. S. Mohammed, F. Najmi, R. Hussin et al., "Wheel-shaped miniature assembly of circularly polarized wideband microstrip antenna for 5G mmWave terminals," Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 2457–2470, 2021.
18. D. Li, J. A. Wang, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, Z. Chen and L. Yang, "Substrate integrated waveguide-based complementary split-ring resonator and its arrays for compact dual-wideband bandpass filter design," International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, article no. e22504, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1002/mmce.22504 .

19. F. Wu, L. Xiang, Z. Jiang, C. Yu and W. Hong, "A wideband dual-polarized magneto-electric dipole antenna for millimeter wave applications," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1452–1457, 2021.
crossref pdf
20. S. Kamal, A. S. Mohammed, M. F. Bin Ain, U. Ullah, R. Hussin, Z. Arifin Ahmad, M, Othman and M. F. Ab Rahman, "A novel negative meander line design of microstrip antenna for 28 GHz mmwave wireless communications," Radioengineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 479–485, 2020.
21. S. Kamal, A. S. Mohammed, M. F. B. Ain, F. Najmi, R. Hussin, Z. A. Ahmad, U. Ullah, M. Othman and M. F. A. Rahman, "A novel lumped LC resonator antenna with air-substrate for 5G mobile terminals," Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 88, pp. 75–81, 2020.
22. W. Su, J. Li and R. H. Liu, "A compact double-layer wideband circularly polarized microstrip antenna with parasitic elements," International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, article no. e22471, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1002/mmce.22471 .

23. S. Kamal and A. Chaudhari, "Printed meander line MIMO antenna integrated with air gap, DGS and RIS: low mutual coupling design for LTE applications," Progress in Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 71, pp. 149–159, 2017.

24. C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design. New York, NY: Wiley, 2016.

25. U. Ullah and S. Koziel, "A geometrically simple compact wideband circularly polarized antenna," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1179–1183, 2019.
26. N. Nguyen-Trong, A. Piotrowski, L. Hall and C. Fumeaux, "A frequency-and polarization-reconfigurable circular cavity antenna," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, pp. 999–1002, 2016.
27. U. Ullah, S. Koziel and I. B. Mabrouk, "Rapid redesign and bandwidth/size tradeoffs for compact wideband circular polarization antennas using inverse surrogates and fast EM-based parameter tuning," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 2019.
28. U. Ullah, I. B. Mabrouk and S. Koziel, "A compact circularly polarized antenna with directional pattern for wearable off-body communications," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2523–2527, 2019.
29. U. Ullah, I. B. Mabrouk and S. Koziel, "Enhanced-performance circularly polarized MIMO antenna with polarization/pattern diversity," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 11887–11895, 2020.
30. W. H. Zhang, W. J. Lu and K. W. Tam, "Circularly polarized complementary antenna with tilted beam based on orthogonal dipoles," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1406–1410, 2018.
31. P. H. Rao, G. Praveen, C. Anukumar, G. Kailash and Y. K. Verma, "Circularly polarised printed tilted beam antenna," IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 510–518, 2019.
crossref pdf
32. E. B. Lima, S. A. Matos, J. R. Costa, C. A. Fernandes and N. J. Fonseca, "Circular polarization wide-angle beam steering at Ka-band by in-plane translation of a plate lens antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 5443–5455, 2015.
33. T. L. Zhang, X. Q. Yang, D. L. Fei and Z. H. Yan, "Single-arm helical antenna with width of arm varying periodically for tilted beam," Electronics Letters, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 736–738, 2015.
crossref pdf
34. H. Nakano, J. Eto, Y. Okabe and J. Yamauchi, "Tilted-and axial-beam formation by a single-arm rectangular spiral antenna with compact dielectric substrate and conducting plane," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2002.
35. H. Nakano, N. Aso, N. Mizobe and J. Yamauchi, "Low-profile composite helical-spiral antenna for a circularly-polarized tilted beam," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2710–2713, 2011.
36. K. Hirose, S. Okazaki and H. Nakano, "Double-loop antennas for a circularly polarized tilted beam," Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part I: Communications), vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 12–20, 2003.
37. B. Li, S. W. Liao and Q. Xue, "Omnidirectional circularly polarized antenna combining monopole and loop radiators," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 12, pp. 607–610, 2013.
38. D. Gopi, A. R. Vadaboyina and J. R. K. Dabbakuti, "DGS based monopole circular-shaped patch antenna for UWB applications," SN Applied Sciences, vol. 3, article no. 198, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04123-w .
crossref pdf
39. G. Dattatreya, K. Kousalya, Y. Jyothirmayi, M. V. Krishna, D. Harsha, P. A. V. Sri and K. K. Naik, "Analysis of complementary split ring resonators on rectangular patch with inset feed for X-band application," In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference of Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA); Coimbatore, India. 2017; pp 248–250.
40. R. Azim, M. T. Islam and N. Misran, "Compact tapered-shape slot antenna for UWB applications," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 1190–1193, 2011.
41. F. Gharakhili, M. Fardis, G. R. Dadashzadeh, A. Ahmadi and N. Hojjat, "Circular slot with a novel circular microstrip open ended microstrip feed for UWB applications," Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 68, pp. 161–167, 2007.
42. J. Liang, C. C. Chiau, X. Chen and C. G. Parini, "Printed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra-wideband applications," Electronics Letters, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 1246–1247, 2004.
43. C. J. Chi, "A slot loaded circularly polarized patch antenna for UHF RFID reader," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 4516–4521, 2012.
44. U. D. Yalavarthi, M. S. S. Rukmini and B. T. Madhav, "A compact conformal printed dipole antenna for 5G based vehicular communication applications," Progress in Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 85, pp. 191–208, 2018.
45. W. N. Hardy and L. A. Whitehead, "Split-ring resonator for use in magnetic resonance from 200–2000 MHz," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 213–216, 1981.
46. W. Froncisz and J. S. Hyde, "The loop-gap resonator: a new microwave lumped circuit ESR sample structure," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 515–521, 1982.
47. D. M. Roberts, A. P. Clements, R. McDonald, J. S. Bobowski and T. Johnson, "Mid-range wireless power transfer at 100 MHz using magnetically coupled loop-gap resonators," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 3510–3527, 2021.
48. J. S. Bobowski and A. P. Clements, "Permittivity and conductivity measured using a novel toroidal split-ring resonator," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2132–2138, 2017.
49. W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, D. C. Morgan, R. Liang and K. Zhang, "Precision measurements of the temperature dependence of λ in YBa2Cu3O6.95: strong evidence for nodes in the gap function," Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 25, article no. 3999, 1993; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3999 .
50. J. W. Sidabras, R. R. Mett, W. Froncisz, T. G. Camenisch, J. R. Anderson and J. S. Hyde, "Multipurpose EPR loop-gap resonator and cylindrical TE011 cavity for aqueous samples at 94 GHz," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, no. 3, article no. 034701, 2007; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2709746 .
crossref pmid
51. Y. Twig, E. Suhovoy and A. Blank, "Sensitive surface loop-gap microresonators for electron spin resonance," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 81, no. 10, article no. 104703, 2010; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3488365 .
crossref pmid
52. Y. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Liang and Y. Long, "A wide-bandwidth monopolar patch antenna with dual-ring couplers," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2014, article no. 980120, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/980120 .
crossref pdf
53. L. Guo, M. C. Tang and M. Li, "A low-profile dual-layer patch antenna with a circular polarizer consisting of dual semicircular resonators," Sensors, vol. 18, no. 6, article no. 1773, 2018; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061773 .
crossref pmid pmc
54. A. S. Mohammed, S. Kamal, M. F. bin Ain, R. Hussin, Z. A. Ahmad, U. Ullah, M. Othman and M. F. Ab Rahman, "Mathematical modelling on the effects of conductive material and substrate thickness for air substrate microstrip patch antenna," The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES), vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 674–683, 2020.

55. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering. New York, NY: Wiley, 2009.

56. U. Ullah, M. Al-Hasan, S. Koziel and I. B. Mabrouk, "A series inclined slot-fed circularly polarized antenna for 5G 28 GHz applications," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 351–355, 2021.
57. B. Feng, J. Lai, Q. Zeng and K. L. Chung, "A dual-wideband and high gain magneto-electric dipole antenna and its 3D MIMO system with metasurface for 5G/WiMAX/WLAN/X-band applications," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 33387–33398, 2018.
58. J. Sun and K. M. Luk, "Wideband linearly-polarized and circularly-polarized aperture-coupled magneto-electric dipole antennas fed by microstrip line with electromagnetic bandgap surface," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 43084–43091, 2019.
59. C. Song, E. L. Bennett, J. Xiao and Y. Huang, "Multi-Mode hybrid antennas using liquid dielectric resonator and magneto-electric dipole," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 3132–3143, 2020.
60. W. El-Halwagy, R. Mirzavand, J. Melzer, M. Hossain and P. Mousavi, "Investigation of wideband substrate-integrated vertically-polarized electric dipole antenna and arrays for mm-wave 5G mobile devices," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 2145–2157, 2017.


Shahanawaz Kamal was born in Mumbai, India, in 1991. He received his diploma in electronics and telecommunication engineering from the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, India, in 2010; his B.E. and M.E. degrees in electronics and telecommunication engineering from the University of Mumbai, India, in 2013 and 2017, respectively; and his Ph.D. degree in antennas and propagation from USM, Malaysia, in 2022. He worked as an in-building solution engineer for Vedang Cellular Services Pvt. Ltd., India, in 2014 and as a visiting lecturer at the M. H. Saboo Siddik Polytechnic, India, in 2016. He was affiliated as a graduate research assistant with USM, Malaysia, between 2019 and 2022. He has published numerous technical articles in refereed journals, books, and conference articles. He regularly serves as a peer reviewer for the Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, Progress in Electromagnetics Research, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, Electronics Letters, and IEEE Access. His research interests include the conceptualization, design, development, and measurement of printed circuit board (PCB) or sheet metal antennas with single element, array, and multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configurations for very high frequency (VHF), industrial, scientific and medical (ISM), long-term evolution (LTE), mmWave, and 5G applications.


Mohd Fadzil Bin Ain received his B.S. degree in electronic engineering from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, in 1997; M.S. degree in radio frequency and microwave from USM, Malaysia, in 1999; and Ph.D. degree in radio frequency and microwave from the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, in 2003. In 2003, he joined the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, USM. He is currently a professor with the VK7 grade, the dean of research, postgraduates, and networking, and the director of the Collaborative Microelectronic Design Excellence Centre (CEDEC). He is actively involved in technical consultancy with several companies to repair microwave equipment. His current research interests include the MIMO wireless system on field programmable gate arrays (FPGA)/digital signal processor (DSP), Ka-band transceiver design, dielectric antenna, radio frequency (RF) characterization of dielectric material, and microwave propagation studies. His awards and honors include those from the International Invention Innovation Industrial Design and Technology Exhibition, International Exposition of Research and Inventions of Institutions of Higher Leaning, Malaysia Technology Expo, Malaysian Association of Research Scientists, Seoul International Invention Fair, and iENA as well as the Best Paper for the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Data Networks, Communications, Computers and the International Conference on X-Ray and Related Techniques in Research and Industry.


Ubaid Ullah received his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and electronic engineering from USM in 2013 and 2017, respectively. He is currently affiliated with Al Ain University, United Arab Emirates. His research interests include antenna theory, small antennas, antenna polarization, dielectric resonators, waveguides, mmWave antenna designs, MIMO antenna systems, EM-simulation-driven design, numerical analysis, and microwave circuit design and optimization.


Abdullahi S. B. Mohammed received his B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering from Bayero University Kano, Nigeria, in 2008; M.Sc. degree in electrical engineering with his main focus on telecommunications from Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria, in 2014; and Ph.D. degree in antennas and propagation from USM, Malaysia.


Roslina Hussin received her B.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, in 1994 and an M.Sc. degree in communication engineering from USM in 2016. She works as a research officer at the School of Electrical Electronic, USM. Her research interests are RF and microwave systems, wave propagation, and engineering studies. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in antennas and propagation at the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, USM, Malaysia.


Mohamad Faiz Bin Mohamed Omar received his B.Eng. degree (Hons.) in electronic engineering and an M.Sc. degree in RF microwave engineering from USM, Nibong Tebal, in June 2014 and 2017, respectively. He is currently a research officer at the CEDEC, USM. His current research interests include the simulation and design of high-RF and high-power devices, microwave tomography, and digital image processing.


Fathul Najmi received his B.E. degree in electronic engineering from USM, Malaysia, in 2014. Since 2015, he has been employed as a research officer under the supervision of Professor, Professional Engineer (Ir.) and Doctor (Dr.) Mohd Fadzil Bin Ain. His research interests include microwave circuits.


Zainal Arifin Ahmad received his B.S. degree in materials engineering from USM, Malaysia; M.S. degree from the University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology, United Kingdom; and Ph.D. degree from the University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. He is currently a senior professor at the School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, USM, Malaysia. His current research interests include zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramics for cutting inserts, low-temperature cofired ceramics-based circuits, metal–ceramic joining, crystal glaze ceramic, tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bioceramic, and dielectric ceramic for antennas.


Mohd Fariz Ab Rahman was born in Kota Bharu, Malaysia. He received his B.Eng. (Hons) degree in materials engineering from Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia, in 2010 and his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in materials engineering from USM, Malaysia, in 2014 and 2017, respectively. In 2019, he joined the Universiti Malaysia Kelantan as a postdoctoral researcher, and currently, he is working as a process development engineer at Tele-flex, the laryngeal mask company, Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. He has authored or co-authored more than 30 articles. His interests include materials engineering, materials science, and electroceramics that include the development of ceramic materials for electronic devices.


Mohd Nazri Mahmud received his B.Eng. degree in electronic systems engineering (telecommunications) from the Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, University of Essex, United Kingdom, in 1996 and M.Phil. degree in technology policy from the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, in 2003. He has been a lecturer at the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, USM, since 2006. Previously, he was an engineer with Telekom Malaysia from 1996 to 2006.


Mohamadariff Othman received his B.Eng. degree in electronics from Multimedia University, Malaysia, in 2006; his M.Sc. degree in the RF and microwave field from USM, Malaysia in 2008; and his Ph.D. degree in antennas and propagation from USM in 2015. He joined the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia, as a senior lecturer in 2016 after serving a private university as a lecturer for almost one and a half years. His research interests include 5G antennas, dielectric characterization, dielectric resonator antenna design, and antenna design optimization.


Julie Juliewatty Mohamed received her B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in materials engineering from USM, Malaysia. She was a lecturer in materials and mineral resources engineering at USM between 2008 and 2015. She is currently working as an associate professor in the Faculty of Bioengineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia. She has authored numerous publications in international journals and conference proceedings. Her current research interests include piezoelectric and dielectric electroceramic and intermetallic and composite materials.


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
#706 Totoo Valley, 217 Saechang-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04376, Korea
Tel: +82-2-337-9666    Fax: +82-2-6390-7550    E-mail: admin-jees@kiees.or.kr                

Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next